[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] mono

Helmut Karlowski wrote:

> I agree here, but that doesn't mean that VM and threads should not be
> implemented.

Not at all, I was just not very happy with the suggested implementation ;-)

> As for mono: I think first do the above and then see what is possible.

To put it this way - do we really want to spend CPU cycles on a run-time
interpreter? Is this how to get compact and responsive applications on
our system?

Jo Even