[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] mono



On 2/1/10 5:35 PM, Jo Even Skarstein wrote:
Helmut Karlowski wrote:

I agree here, but that doesn't mean that VM and threads should not be
implemented.
Not at all, I was just not very happy with the suggested implementation ;-)

As for mono: I think first do the above and then see what is possible.
To put it this way - do we really want to spend CPU cycles on a run-time
interpreter? Is this how to get compact and responsive applications on
our system?

Jo Even


Indeed on a system many times as fast as ours (Nokia 770) I have written off mono and gtk# as being too slow. C++ is THE high level language to use on our platform.

Thanks,
Mark