Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.59.1 for your testing pleasure....

[Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>]

On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 19:54:51 , "Helmut Karlowski" <helmut.karlowski@ish.de> wrote:
> Am 13.06.2010, 15:27 Uhr, schrieb Vincent Rivière
> <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>:
>
> > It is about things like:
> > #if EOF != -1
> > and so on.
> >
> > Standard packages (such as binutils) have to be patched to avoid this
> > bug when compiled with GCC 2.95, it is very annoying.
>
> At least the cross-compiler I'm using on cygwin does not have this bug.
> Only the native gcc 2.95.2 that is on one of my TTs does this.
>
> If there's a native gcc 2.95.3 somewhere it should be checked, and if it
> succeeds, just skip gcc 2.95.2 and you're done.
>

Isn't the ancient gcc from Sparemint 2.95.3  ?