[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Bug in MiNTLibs (PL<=44)?

To: binder@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de
Subject: Bug in MiNTLibs (PL<=44)?
From: "Nicholas S Castellano" <entropy@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 1994 17:04:25 -0400
Cc: mint@atari.archive.umich.edu
In-reply-to: Thomas Binder (Gryf)'s message of Tue, 16 Aug 94 18:12:54 MESZ <199408161613.MAA28973@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>

>The MiNT-call Prenice returns a *long* int, but in the .h-file the binding
>is only int (gcc-part and TC/PC-part as well). So you can't distinguish
>(spelling?) between a negative priority and an error when you have 16-bit-
>ints. Is that a bug or a feature?

Sounds like a bug to me.  I'll look into it.  Thanks.

--
entropy -- it's not just a good idea, it's the second law.
Personal mail:      entropy@gnu.ai.mit.edu
MiNT library mail:  entropy@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu
"what do you have against octal?" -jrb

References:
- Bug in MiNTLibs (PL<=44)?
  - From: Thomas Binder (Gryf) <binder@rbg.informatik.th-darmstadt.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Some thoughts on MiNT - Virtual Memor Manager (VMM) needed !!!
Next by Date: Re: MiNTOS Release 1.4 now available.
Previous by thread: Bug in MiNTLibs (PL<=44)?
Next by thread: Re: Various MiNT questions -> Gemini 1.99(99)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread