[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies

To: Petr Stehlik <joy@sophics.zln.cz>, Konrad Kokoszkiewicz <draco@mi.com.pl>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 12:02:31 +0100
Cc: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9902241013050.1535-100000@proxy.sophics>; from Petr Stehlik on Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 10:25:56AM +0100
References: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9902221738450.22337-100000@nidus.mi.com.pl> <Pine.LNX.4.05.9902241013050.1535-100000@proxy.sophics>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 10:25:56AM +0100, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> And why do I use DATE/TIME cookies instead of hooking on traps? It's
> simply easier to write, faster to execute (called once per second, not
> 200x as you thought for unknown reason), requires less code and does not

Um - There *is* no interrupt that is called once per second. What interrupt
do you hook into to update your time display?

cu
Michael
-- 
Michael Schwingen, Ahornstrasse 36, 52074 Aachen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
  - From: Petr Stehlik <joy@sophics.zln.cz>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
  - From: Konrad Kokoszkiewicz <draco@mi.com.pl>
- Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
  - From: Petr Stehlik <joy@sophics.zln.cz>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re: GCC
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re: GCC
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] DATE/TIME cookies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread