[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] fVDI issues
- To: <mint@fishpool.com>
- Subject: Re: [MiNT] fVDI issues
- From: "Konrad Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:14:13 +0100
- Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
- Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
- List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
- List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <20040122144133.GC17739@haddock.cd.chalmers.se> <Pine.NEB.4.58.0401231324200.27393@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <20040123191858.GA28238@haddock.cd.chalmers.se> <Pine.NEB.4.58.0401240939400.13500@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <20040124160439.GA24271@haddock.cd.chalmers.se> <035f01c3e333$a67d1b80$0e0a63d9@blaszak> <Pine.NEB.4.58.0401251345220.13500@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <03d701c3e4af$accb24f0$0e0a63d9@blaszak> <1075193841.3713.14.camel@joy.sophics> <07ba01c3e58b$26865ae0$0e0a63d9@blaszak> <Pine.NEB.4.58.0401281351470.13500@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <20040128184741.Y99259@antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl> <Pine.NEB.4.58.0401282237510.13500@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <092f01c3e675$8cf8bee0$0e0a63d9@blaszak> <Pine.NEB.4.58.0401291615120.13500@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <0a3701c3e69a$38f6db40$0e0a63d9@blaszak> <Pine.NEB.4.58.0401292301160.13500@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <0c0301c3e767$a9d60890$0e0a63d9@blaszak> <Pine.NEB.4.58.0401302112440.13500@wh58-508.st.u! ni-magdeburg.de>
- Reply-to: "Konrad Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>
- Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
>>> Btw. this is an interesting question in general. What is the right
>>> behaviour if an AES process fork? And is an AES process allowed to
>>> fork?
>>
>> Yes and no, I suppose. AFAIK fork() is allowed for any process,
>> regardless of what libraries or system functions it uses. At the
>> other hand, Atari programmers, while designing their multitasking
>> AES 4.0 probably didn't think/know, that MultiTOS is supposed to
>> have Pfork().
>
> And what do you think is the right behaviour?
The right behaviour is as in the first case.
--
CVV
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz, http://draco.atari.org
** Ea natura multitudinis est, aut seruit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur.
** Taka to juz natura pospólstwa, albo sluzalczo sie plaszczy,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy. (T. Liuius XXIV, 25).