[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost

To: <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
From: <jan.thomas@bt.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:51:36 +0100
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Thread-index: AcWJyN0tm0Sg7SqSR5CVUv/WM5c+vgAElO82
Thread-topic: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost

-----Original Message-----
From: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi on behalf of Maurits van de Kamp
Sent: Sat 16/07/2005 06:39
To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
 
>But even now I'm used to a 2x1.8GHz G5, my TT still doesn't feel sluggish or obsolete at all. As long as I don't use it to browse the web. ;o)

Yeah, odd that. My TT is crisp at only 32mhz, but my 80/25mhz CT60'd Falcon is painfully slow screen-wise.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] GEM boost
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread