[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
From: "olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr" <Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 21:33:02 +0100
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <43988E5F.6000201@free.fr>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4397F4C3.7030701@utbm.fr> <1134035229.5776.50.camel@linuxbox> <4398098F.2010604@utbm.fr> <43988E5F.6000201@free.fr>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.8

>
> I see only two choices: an application is ready to catch WM_REPOSED for
> all its windows, or it is not. I really don't see why a developper may
> choice to manage WM_REPOSED for some windows, and choice to not manage
> WM_REPOSED for others... it's so simple to support WM_REPOSED !
>

yes this my opinion too, it's why I have ask question, now with -1 option for
windows all windows support this, I suppose all programmers will use it if they
know it. I don't know if specific windows manangment for this message is
usefull.


Olivier

References:
- [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
  - From: Olivier Landemarre <olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
  - From: Odd Skancke <ozk@atari.org>
- Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
  - From: Olivier Landemarre <olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
  - From: Arnaud BERCEGEAY <arnaud.bercegeay@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
Next by Date: [MiNT] Re[2]: WM_REPOSED implementation
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] WM_REPOSED implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread