[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] MiNTNet "land" bug fixed

To: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNTNet "land" bug fixed
From: "Guido Flohr" <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 03:47:41 +0200
In-reply-to: <Pine.MNT.4.05.9905121028490.522-100000@tos>; from Mario Becroft on Wed, May 12, 1999 at 10:39:48AM +1200
Mail-followup-to: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
References: <19990511172557.B281@zowee.rz.uni-sb.de> <Pine.MNT.4.05.9905121028490.522-100000@tos>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 10:39:48AM +1200, Mario Becroft wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 1999, Guido Flohr wrote:
> > Isn't it possible to find the real reason for the freeze and fix that
> > instead?
> 
> Probably, but this would require much more complicated looking into the
> internals of the TCP implementation which I didn't want to do. Some people
> complained about MiNTNet being frozen by this land program, and this does
> fix that, that's all I was worried about.

Sure, I was only thinking that MiNTNet has other caveats, too.  Maybe
finding the real reason for the land-freeze-bug reveals other bugs.  It is
even not strictly impossible that this will help with the said-to-be
kernel freezes discussed lately.

Ciao

Guido
-- 
http://stud.uni-sb.de/~gufl0000
mailto:gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de

References:
- Re: [MiNT] MiNTNet "land" bug fixed
  - From: "Guido Flohr" <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>
- Re: [MiNT] MiNTNet "land" bug fixed
  - From: Mario Becroft <mb@tos.pl.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] VDI without AES
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.51
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNTNet "land" bug fixed
Next by thread: RE: [MiNT] MiNTNet "land" bug fixed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread