[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
From: Petr Stehlik <joy@sophics.cz>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:22:36 +0200
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.60.0407121106000.1631@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <001901c46765$e7997c10$680863d9@blaszak> <Pine.NEB.4.60.0407112339070.1631@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <018901c467a1$a3a85490$4f0863d9@blaszak> <Pine.NEB.4.60.0407120713400.1631@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <40F23DFF.4050403@seznam.cz> <Pine.NEB.4.60.0407120942120.1631@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <40F24441.6020709@seznam.cz> <Pine.NEB.4.60.0407121006190.1631@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <40F24B09.20503@seznam.cz> <Pine.NEB.4.60.0407121039140.1631@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de> <40F250B2.4060307@seznam.cz> <Pine.NEB.4.60.0407121106000.1631@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

V Po, 12. 07. 2004 v 11:07, Frank Naumann píše:
> > I don't really know whether it is documented, but once it works that way. I 
> > think we can follow that to gain more compatibility.
> 
> Opinions?

I'd suggest to write a simple test case and run it quickly on all TOS
versions (using STonX and ARAnyM it can be tested on anything from TOS
1.0 to TOS 4.0.4 in few minutes, with the exception of TOS 3.x that
should be same as TOS 2.x). If there is a consistent behavior in all TOS
versions then I'd be for implementing it in MiNT as well.

Petr

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>

References:
- [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: "Konrad Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>
- Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>
- Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: "Konrad Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>
- Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>
- Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>
- Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>
- Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>
- Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>
- Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>
- Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>
- Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: Standa Opichal <opichals@seznam.cz>
- Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Bug in FATFS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread