Hello!
I don't really know whether it is documented, but once it works that way. I think we can follow that to gain more compatibility.
Opinions?
So the Fopen() is the syscall to be fixed.. Actually the fatfs.c, but only for the case when the VFAT extensions are not enabled.... OR maybe better when VFAT extension is found for that name then only the first extension should be considered in fatfs.c: fatfs_lookup() ?What do you think?This is documented TOS behaviour?========= GFA_BCOM G_61 Fopen "F:\VDI_BASE.GFA.GFA" ReadOnly -> 7
Regards, Frank -- ATARI FALCON 060 // MILAN 060 ----------------------------------------- http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/ e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de