[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] freemint 1.16.0b stability

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] freemint 1.16.0b stability
From: M.Jurik@sh.cvut.cz
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:19:30 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <20040723084333.GA6863@hysteria.sk>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407221337190.32673-100000@gem.atari.org> <00b901c4700b$2e34a610$340963d9@blaszak> <20040723084333.GA6863@hysteria.sk>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a

Hi,

> but that idea with daily updated binaries isn't bad.

  IMHO, it is very bad idea. OS kernel isn't a standard software.
  It isn't good idea to build daily snapshot for kernel because there can
be some non-completed modifications and e.g. it can cause data losts.
  Draco generated some builds, I think it is enough. Yes, he could send
some announcements here. Maybe more frequently.
  And btw. AFROS use alpha builds.
  Best regards,

         Milan Jurik

References:
- Re: [MiNT] freemint 1.16.0b stability
  - From: Anders Eriksson <ae@dhs.nu>
- Re: [MiNT] freemint 1.16.0b stability
  - From: "Konrad Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>
- Re: [MiNT] freemint 1.16.0b stability
  - From: mikro <mikro@hysteria.sk>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] freemint 1.16.0b stability
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] freemint 1.16.0b stability
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] freemint 1.16.0b stability
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] freemint 1.16.0b stability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread