Re: AW: AW: [MiNT] tosfs

["Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>]

> Try some of the applications I have mentioned and, if you keep

You didn't mention anything. And you are not able to, because such list
does not exist. Neither a list of "pre-TOS 1.02 calls which fail on
newfatfs" exist outside your imagination, Martin. Neither Compendium says
anything like this, the text "1.04" (as in "supported until TOS
1.04") only occurs in Compendium under Sversion(), in a list of GEMDOS
versions relative to TOS versions. Before you can prove your statements
with examples (the text "Kellis has a list of applications which fail" is
not an example, it's another phantasma), you cannot expect your statements
will be taken seriously here, or anywhere else.

Anyways, list members, from the discussion I understand that there are no
objections against TOSFS removal.

--
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz
mail: draco@atari.org
http://draco.atari.org

** Ea natura multitudinis est,
** aut servit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur (Liv. XXIV,25)
*************************************************************
** Taka to juz natura pospolstwa, ze albo sluzy ono unizenie,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy.