[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost

To: Olivier Landemarre <olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 17:17:53 -0500
Cc: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <42DB6CB7.6030402@utbm.fr>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <F6E60FAE8239614A97E6B60FDCB29A8F46D9DF@i2km86-ukdy.domain1.systemhost.net> <1121641134.31543.2.camel@mduckworth.phillypark.net> <20050717201004.gd13ankfa33koogc@coolrunningconcepts.com> <200507181009.52513.maurits@bassment.nu> <42DB6CB7.6030402@utbm.fr>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 10:47 +0200, Olivier Landemarre wrote:

> This a bad idea, I know RPM, I use Linux but I prefer Magic than any 
> other Atari system, because I use it for near 10 years on a Mac.Atari  
> developpers are not only on Mint! And I know other people like me!

Then my next question is - what would make MiNT more attractive to MagiC
users, or rather what is unattractive about MiNT?  The "runs on a Mac"
is obvious, and we can't do that (although maybe a TSR to implement
calls that Magic doesn't have might be worth it, although it would be a
tough hack).

Also, off-topic a bit ... is MagicMAC available in a trial or demo
version?  I want to see if it runs on Executor - a program that emulates
a MAC on my NeXT.   Its the only 68K hardware I have right now.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com>
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>
- [MiNT] MagiCMAC (was: GEM boost)
  - From: Gerhard_Stoll@b.maus.de (Gerhard Stoll)

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: <jan.thomas@bt.com>
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com>
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: evan@coolrunningconcepts.com
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: Olivier Landemarre <olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK implementation : conclusions.
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] recent gcc crosscompiler
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] (No Refences....)
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread