Le 27/09/2012 09:09, Zorro a écrit :
Le 27/09/12 07:20, OL a écrit :I'm not agree with you, callbacks to client mintlibs looks a good idea but I don't think so, because in this case it can work only with GCC never with other client compiler. The only way to do what you want is to create an other ldg that provide mintlib like api called or by the application or ldg itself and share it with ldg. So minimum 2 mintlib link by client.Yes, it's true but the advantages are so important that I don't see the PureC incompatibility as a huge problem.
Nowdays I not see this is a real problem, new computer have so many memory now, even on real hardware (most use now CT60 and now some coldfire), if Mintlib was design to reduce its memory print I think the solution should be better, generally only a small part of libc is use by an application, the PureC version make far more light application to do near the same.
The best way would be to keep the old LDG for the compatibility and to make a LDG version 2 for the modernity/stability/easy-to-use.
I not see what problem of stabilty or easy to use, it's just like an application
Olivier
Just my 2 cents... -- Zorro